

The state of our nation is in peril due to large corporate influence that places mercantile interests ahead of true representation. These 3 claims made by the Supreme Court majority decision in 2010's Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case point to the absurdity of the decision. 1. "Independent spending CANNOT corrupt" 2. "Getting influence and access to politicians is NOT corrupting." 3. "Unlimited spending CANNOT damage people's faith in democracy." We disagree with all three and suspect that you probably do too.
Good Citizens United takes the idea of a SUPER PAC (in this case, as an independent expenditure committee formally registered and compliant with the NYS BOE and NYC BOE) and uses its vehicle with the intent of promoting voices and ideas that help turn the page on this dark age of corporate rule. It seeks to push the government to mitigate corporate influence through campaign finance reform and bring good faith-ed debate back to the forefront of our republic. The goal is restore elections to their proper purpose: providing the citizens of this great land with a representative democratic voice. One vote equals one vote and large pools of corporate money does not equal free speech.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.